Principle Of
DOUBLE EFFECT
A rule of conduct frequently used in moral theology to
determine when a person may lawfully perform an action from which two effects
will follow, one bad, and the other good.
Conditions. Theologians commonly teach that four conditions must be
verified in order that a person may legitimately perform such an act.
- The act itself must be
morally good or at least indifferent.
- The agent may not
positively will the bad effect but may merely permit it. If he could
attain the good effect without the bad effect, he should do so. The bad
effect is sometimes said to be indirectly voluntary.
- The good effect must
flow from the action at least as immediately (in the order of causality,
though not necessarily in the order of time) as the bad effect. In other
words, the good effect must be produced directly by the action, not by the
bad effect. Otherwise, the agent would be using a bad means to a good end,
which is never allowed.
- The good effect must be
sufficiently desirable to compensate for the allowing of the bad effect.
In forming this decision many factors must be weighed and compared, with
care and prudence proportionate to the importance of the case. Thus, an
effect that benefits or harms society generally has more weight than one
that affects only an individual; an effect sure to occur deserves greater
consideration than one that is only probable; an effect of a moral nature
has greater importance than one that deals only with material things.
Of these four conditions the first two are general rules of
morality. A person is never allowed to perform a morally bad action. Nor may
one ever positively will an evil effect of an action, even though the act would
otherwise be lawful. Thus, a censor of books, who is allowed to read obscene literature,
may not take deliberate pleasure in the evil thoughts arising in consequence,
though he necessarily permits them to enter his mind. The third and fourth
conditions enumerated above pertain specifically to the principle of the double
effect.