Happiness
vs. Happen-ness
How close those words are in sound
and spelling yet so very distinc˜t in the souls of those with young or
non-existent faith. In other words, how can
we be consistently happy if what happens to us often makes us feel
unhappy? Certainly death, itself, is
seen (at least in our culture) as the ultimate unhappy event and yet we all
know we must face it at some point. The
question, then, becomes, How can we live
life happily when the certainty of death looms in the future? What is the point of living if it all ends
with nothing more than my death? I
believe that what Kropf is saying at the beginning of his book is that we do,
indeed, risk a meaningless existence if our life consists of nothing more than
a frenzied attempt to somehow avoid death or non-existence.
I still grapple with trying to find meaning in
(or meaning to) my life on earth while I know, for certain, that it will
someday end. I ve chosen, here, to begin
examining my own development of this understanding by remembering my own ideas
of life and death. My mother,
undoubtedly, has shoe boxes in her att ic filled with my early drawings of what
I was certain was a literal representation of Heaven. (My almost four-year-old daughter, Emmy,
illustrated this same phenomenon last week when she asked me if we could go to
heaven after church to sing and have cookies)
I later prided myself on my ability to distinguish the idea of Heaven, with
pearly gates, harps and angels, as merely a symbol of everlasting life. In fact, I saw myself as downright precocious
in my ability to reject the Sunday School literality of the Eternal Kingdom . However, looking back, I still retained the
notion (or at least the fervent hope) that there was some kind of existence
after death; not necessarily that I would exist in human form but that I would
retain human consciousness. Further,
not only would I be conscious but I would have my own consciousness carried over from my previous life
complete with i ts memories, relationships, values, etc. Later in college, when confronted with the
idea of existentialism, I thought it would be pretty neat to reject the whole
idea of any eternal life. You live, you die, that s it, too bad. (Of course,
being 17 and newly independent, this avenue of thinking was appealing for its
shock value as well...) Predictably, I wasn t able to genuinely embrace the
idea of eternal nothingness for very long and was faced once again with the
task of finding a more comfortable belief regarding my fate. ( It should be
noted that I continued to worry about my
fate, still never considering that anything in my life could be more
monumental or meaningful than my own
living or dying.) I had thus far not
come anywhere near the self-transcendence
that Kropf speaks about. In fact,
I was still quite entrenched in the idea that I could dictate my own
prescription for happiness, assuming it was fairly reasonable. The flexibility that we spoke about in class
was not there and I figured that if I just decided what I had to have and
prayed hard enough, it would have to happen.
I still had the bothersome thought of death nagging in the background
but, by god, I was going to have the earthly life I wanted even if it did kill
me.
I thought I had it pretty well under
wraps; I was doing the right
things, I wasn t drinking (too much), I wasn t smoking (at least while
asleep), I was going to school, had a
nice part-time job and was reasonably kind to people. I was quite satisfied that I had surpassed
Freud s pleasure principle and was concerned with more meaningful
things (getting a degree, winning my boyfriend s commitment, having good
friends). I was well on the way to
self-actualization and had a true drive for self-determination (Adler).
Why, then
did the idea of death still haunt me?
(Perhaps the fact that I used
I 10 times in the last paragraph
would begin to( lead to a clue...but for now, I had to construct another image
of the hereafter.)
I began to develop the theory that
after we die we would have total knowledge, a full realm of emotion, be fully integrated in mind and soul
and would be one with the universe. Of
course, we wouldn t have the same type of consciousness to which we had been
accustomed but we would not cease to exist.
Again, all too soon the nagging doubt crept
in. After all, no amount of belief could
absolutely prove,
beyond a
shadow of a doubt, that there really was anything after this life. I still had a hunger for a guaranteeof
immortality because like Unamuno believes,
I could not conceive of nor tolerate the idea of not being .
It took me thirty (something) years
to begin to realize that the quest cannot be for the perfect idea of
immortality nor can the idea of living
forever be a motivation for one s
actions on earth. I had to begin the
attempt to transcend myself and my thoughts about death. Sure I had solid goals but those goals failed
the test of ultimacy (Kropf).
My life was pretty good although it still ran the risk of being
completely meaningless in the face of death. [
....Narcotics cannot still the Tooth that nibbles at the soul . (Emily Dickinson, ca.1882)]
Kropf talks about the very powerful
concept that our idea of existence must be directed beyond ourselves. We must transcend ourselves to the point that
we become more than what we are . He goes on to ask How can there be self-transcendence without
there being a tran~scendent meaning beyond that which we make up in our own
minds? In other words, if we are not
humanly capable of understanding what lies beyond us, how can we be comfortable
with and accept it?
Although I still have a lot of
growing to do, I m beginning to realize
that I not only have to cease being obsessed with my own existence and
immortality but to relax on the whole idea in general. (Perhaps the existentialists were right after
all.) Rilke states ...the eternal and
mysterious will not be bent by us...His growth is this: to be deeply defeated
by the ever-greater one . I understand
this to mean that there is an ultimate
meaning and it is too great for me to fathom ( if I could fathom it, it would
then cease to be great). With the help
of Victor Frankl, I m beginning to see that the only answer lies in trusting
that there is an ultimate meaning. The
answer is Faith.